WEATHER ALERT
Judge rules DOGE's USAID dismantling likely violates the Constitution
Read full article: Judge rules DOGE's USAID dismantling likely violates the ConstitutionA federal judge ruled Tuesday that the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development likely violated the Constitution in an order that blocked Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from making further cuts to the agency.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/Q7EMV7H2AJBVXDGARGQVIV65LU.jpg)
Child porn purveyor to get 21-27 years under new plea deal
Read full article: Child porn purveyor to get 21-27 years under new plea dealA man whom U.S. authorities have described as the world’s largest purveyor of child pornography would be sentenced to 21 to 27 years in prison under the terms of a new plea deal.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/VEN54FTZTJDYHNL3GX7ZFJDNVM.jpg)
Justices asked again to reinstate rule for abortion pill
Read full article: Justices asked again to reinstate rule for abortion pillFILE - In this Nov. 4, 2020 photo, The Supreme Court in Washington. Scott Applewhite)WASHINGTON – The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court a second time to reinstate a rule that women must pick up an abortion pill in person during the COVID-19 pandemic. The administration has suspended similar in-person visits for other drugs, including opioids in some cases, but refused to relax the rules for getting the abortion pill. Since July, Chuang’s order has temporarily prohibited the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from enforcing the requirement that a woman visit a hospital, clinic or medical office to obtain the drug mifepristone during the pandemic. In October, the Supreme Court allowed women to continue getting the abortion pill by mail, but deferred any substantive ruling.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/LCKOGN3NZZDC5L6KDBO4ZCDFSI.jpg)
Judge refuses to reinstate rule for dispensing abortion pill
Read full article: Judge refuses to reinstate rule for dispensing abortion pill– A federal judge in Maryland has denied the Trump administration's request to reinstate a rule that would require women to visit a hospital, clinic or medical office to obtain an abortion pill during the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that public health risks for patients only have grown worse. U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang, who agreed to suspend the rule in July, refused Wednesday to lift or limit the scope of that order. The judge concluded that the rule imposes a “substantial obstacle” to abortion patients and likely is unconstitutional under the pandemic's circumstances. Chuang’s ruling allows health care providers to arrange for mifepristone to be mailed or delivered to patients during the pandemic. “The Trump administration’s argument that this travel mandate for abortion patients no longer poses significant COVID-19 risks is violently out of touch with reality,” ACLU attorney Julia Kaye said in a statement Wednesday.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/SNYNBY5Q4BBQRBFXO2N7DNIIHI.jpg)
Judge: Women can get abortion pill without doctor visits
Read full article: Judge: Women can get abortion pill without doctor visitsA federal judge agreed Monday to suspend a rule that requires women during the COVID-19 pandemic to visit a hospital, clinic or medical office to obtain an abortion pill. U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland concluded that the in-person requirements for patients seeking medication abortion care impose a substantial obstacle to abortion patients and are likely unconstitutional under the circumstances of the pandemic. "Particularly in light of the limited timeframe during which a medication abortion or any abortion must occur, such infringement on the right to an abortion would constitute irreparable harm," the judge wrote in his 80-page decision. By causing certain patients to decide between forgoing or substantially delaying abortion care, or risking exposure to COVID-19 for themselves, their children, and family members, the In-Person Requirements present a serious burden to many abortion patients, Chuang wrote. The judge said suspending the requirements aligns with public health guidance to eliminate unnecessary travel and in-person contact.