Skip to main content
Clear icon
69Āŗ

Character concerns go beyond PEDs in this Hall of Fame vote

FILE - In this Oct. 25, 2007, file photo, Boston Red Sox's Curt Schilling pitches against the Colorado Rockies in Game 2 of the baseball World Series at Fenway Park in Boston. Like many baseball writers, C. Trent Rosecrans viewed the Hall of Fame vote as a labor of love. The results of the 2021 vote will be announced Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2021, and Rosecrans was not alone in finding the task particularly agonizing this time around. With Schilling's candidacy now front and center and Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens still on the ballot as well voters have had to consider how much a players off-field behavior should affect his Hall of Fame chances. (AP Photo/Kathy Willens, File) (Kathy Willens, AP2007)

Like many baseball writers, C. Trent Rosecrans viewed the Hall of Fame vote as a labor of love. The ballot would arrive around the end of November, and it would keep him occupied for much of December. Heā€™d write down his research on players in a notebook and feel butterflies when putting his ballot in the mail.

Then it was time for his most recent vote, and the whole process felt quite different.

Recommended Videos



ā€œThat ballot sat out unopened until after Christmas, because I knew what was in it,ā€ Rosecrans said. ā€œAnd it wasnā€™t something I enjoyed.ā€

The results of the 2021 vote will be announced Tuesday, and Rosecrans wasnā€™t alone in finding the task particularly agonizing this time around. With Curt Schilling's candidacy now front and center ā€” and Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens still on the ballot as well ā€” voters have had to consider how much a playerā€™s off-field behavior should affect his Hall of Fame chances.

For years, suspicions of performance-enhancing drug use have played a significant role in the voting. Now, some writers are reassessing other concerns about some of the gameā€™s biggest stars ā€” from Schillingā€™s incendiary social media presence to domestic violence allegations against Bonds and others.

Ken Rosenthal, Rosecransā€™ colleague with The Athletic, began a recent column this way: ā€œI hate my Hall of Fame ballot. It might be my last."

The top returning vote-getter on this yearā€™s ballot is Schilling, who a year ago came within 20 votes of being elected by the Baseball Writersā€™ Association of America. His support now seems to have stalled.

As of early Saturday, Schilling had received 75.3% approval on ballots tallied at Ryan Thibodauxā€™s tracker, but that pace probably isnā€™t good enough. A player needs 75% for induction ā€” and in the past, Schilling has fared far worse on private, unreleased ballots that arenā€™t part of Thibodauxā€™s tracker.

Schilling has turned off voters with his post-career behavior. ESPN suspended him from the Little League World Series a few years ago over a tweet in which he compared Muslim extremists to Nazi-era Germans. He was later fired by the network for Facebook comments about transgender people.

On Jan. 6, the day of the attack on the U.S. Capitol, he said the following in a message on his Twitter account:

ā€œYou cowards sat on your hands, did nothing while liberal trash looted rioted and burned for air Jordanā€™s and big screens, sit back .... and watch folks start a confrontation for (expletive) that matters like rights, democracy and the end of govt corruption.ā€

That tweet was a few days after Hall of Fame ballots were due, but Rosecrans had already decided not to support Schilling ā€” even though heā€™d voted for him in the past.

ā€œIt would have been much easier for me to stick where I was and to check that box, like I have every other time Iā€™ve voted, but I just donā€™t know if I would have been true to myself,ā€ said Rosecrans, the BBWAA's president. "Had I done that, I may have felt better where I put it on that day. I donā€™t know if I would have felt better on January 6th.ā€

Bonds and Clemens are polling just behind Schilling on Thibodauxā€™s tracker, but their candidacies now face scrutiny that goes beyond longstanding suspicion of PED use. Multiple players on this year's ballot have been accused of domestic violence, and Bonds is one of them. In 1995, his ex-wife testified during divorce proceedings that he beat and kicked her. Bonds said he never physically abused her but once kicked her after she kicked him.

In 2008, the New York Daily News reported that Clemens had a decade-long relationship with country singer Mindy McCready that began when she was 15 and he was a star for the Boston Red Sox. Clemens apologized for unspecified mistakes in his personal life and denied having an affair with a 15-year-old. McCready later told ā€œInside Editionā€ she met Clemens when she was 16 and that the relationship didnā€™t turn sexual until several years later.

Rosenthal acknowledged the domestic abuse allegations that have been made against Bonds, Andruw Jones and Omar Vizquel, as well as the questions about Clemens and McCready. He ended up voting for those four players along with Schilling, and his 10-man ballot also included Todd Helton, who in recent years pleaded guilty to driving under the influence and served 48 hours in jail.

Rosenthal called it his ā€œsick-to-my-stomach ballotā€ and said heā€™s reevaluating whether he wants to vote at all in the future.

Last January, ESPNā€™s Christina Kahrl said sheā€™d looked at the questions surrounding Clemens and McCready. ā€œShould he ultimately get elected, it will have to be without my support,ā€ she wrote then.

Rosecrans acknowledges he could be accused of inconsistency after voting against Schilling but in favor of people like Bonds and Jones. His main concern is the platform a Hall inductee receives ā€” the ceremony and the speech, for example.

ā€œWe have seen what Curt Schilling does with a platform, and it has been chilling,ā€ Rosecrans said.

At a time when social justice movements are pushing for a broader reckoning on sexual misconduct and racial inequality, the BBWAA recently voted overwhelmingly to remove the name and imprint of former Commissioner Kenesaw Mountain Landis from MVP plaques. Landis became commissioner in 1920, and there were no Black players in the majors during his more than two decades in charge.

The Hall of Fame, meanwhile, has sought to clarify the role of its plaque gallery and its museum. The plaques recognize membersā€™ baseball accomplishments, while the rest of the museum might address other aspects of their careers.

For example, Cap Ansonā€™s plaque describes him as the greatest hitter and greatest National League player-manager of the 19th century, but language exploring his role in baseballā€™s segregation has been installed in the museumā€™s ā€œIdeals and Injusticesā€ exhibit.

ā€œGiven the importance of racial issues in the summer of 2020, our board decided we needed to tell a fuller story and explore issues surrounding race that involved several of our members,ā€ Hall spokesman Jon Shestakofsky said. ā€œWith our baseball-focused mission, we are cautious about getting into other issues, given the fact that once you go down that path, reasonable people will disagree about what is and is not relevant and worthy of display in a baseball museum."

So it remains up to the voters to decide how theyā€™ll weigh off-field issues when evaluating Hall of Fame candidates. The Hall instructs voters to take into account ā€œthe playerā€™s record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.ā€

Clearly, thereā€™s room to consider a playerā€™s off-field conduct.

But the Hall is still primarily a baseball honor. Right now, the sportā€™s career leaders in home runs (Bonds) and hits (Pete Rose) are not enshrined. Neither is Clemens, with his seven Cy Young Awards, or Schilling, with his dazzling postseason resume.

If too many of the top players are left out ā€” particularly if itā€™s for non-baseball reasons ā€” could the Hall lose credibility as a baseball shrine?

Lynn Henning, a former columnist for the Detroit News, understands what makes some of these candidates objectionable ā€” but he doesnā€™t think the Hall of Fame vote is the right forum for holding them accountable.

ā€œI believe there is a separate realm in which we can and must discuss all of those points, but I donā€™t think it should be adjudicated on a Hall of Fame ballot,ā€ Henning said.

___

Follow Noah Trister at www.Twitter.com/noahtrister

___

More AP MLB: https://apnews.com/MLB and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports


Loading...

Recommended Videos