JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. ā A Missouri judge on Friday ruled that an abortion-rights campaign did not meet legal requirements to qualify for the November ballot, potentially thwarting a yearslong effort to undo the state's near-total abortion ban.
But Cole County Circuit Judge Christopher Limbaugh stopped short of removing the measure from the ballot. Instead, he gave the abortion-rights campaign a chance to file a last-minute appeal before Tuesday's deadline to make changes to the Missouri ballot.
Recommended Videos
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom will appeal the decision and hopes for āa swift resolution so that Missourians can vote on November 5 to protect reproductive freedom, including access to abortion, birth control and miscarriage care," campaign manager Rachel Sweet said in a statement.
āThe courtās decision to block Amendment 3 from appearing on the ballot is a profound injustice to the initiative petition process and undermines the rights of the 380,000 Missourians who signed our petition demanding a voice on this critical issue,ā Sweet said.
In his ruling, Limbaugh said Missourians for Constitutional Freedom did not do enough during the signature-gathering process to inform voters that the measure would undo the stateās near-total abortion ban.
āThat said, this court also recognizes the gravity of the unique issues involved in this case, and the lack of direct precedent on point,ā Limbaugh wrote. āThe court therefore will stay execution of issuing an injunction up until September 10, 2024, the statutory deadline for the case to be heard, so that further guidance or rulings can be provided by a reviewing court.ā
At least nine other states will consider constitutional amendments enshrining abortion rights this fall ā Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada and South Dakota. Most would guarantee a right to abortion until fetal viability and allow it later for the health of the pregnant woman, which is what the Missouri proposal would do.
New York also has a ballot measure that proponents say would protect abortion rights, though thereās a dispute about its impact.
Voters in all seven states that have had abortion questions on their ballots since 2022 have sided with abortion-rights supporters.
A group of abortion opponents last month sued to have the Missouri amendment removed from the ballot.
Plaintiff's attorney Mary Catherine Martin during a Friday bench trial said at least some voters would not have signed the petition to put the amendment on the ballot if they had known about all the laws that could be repealed.
āThere is no way to know if the proponents of this radical amendment would have gathered enough signatures to place this on the ballot if the truth about the staggering scope of laws Amendment 3 invalidates had been disclosed,ā the plaintiffs said in a statement following the judgeās ruling.
Loretta Haggard, a lawyer for the abortion-rights campaign, argued that it will be up to future judges to decide which abortion laws are thrown out if the amendment is adopted.
āCourts should not give āadvisory opinionsā or speculate whether a particular proposal would, if adopted, violate the law,ā lawyers for the campaign wrote in a court brief.
Missouri banned most abortions immediately after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. There is an exception for medical emergencies, but almost no abortions have occurred at Missouri facilities since then.
Missouriās ACLU branch, local Planned Parenthoods and a group called Abortion Action in Missouri launched a campaign to legalize abortion in response to the ban. Although women who receive abortions are protected from criminal liability in Missouri, anyone who performs an abortion outside the stateās limited exceptions faces felony charges.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom's proposed amendment would guarantee an individualās right to get an abortion and make other reproductive health decisions.