MIAMI — Joe Carollo scored another legal victory in his fight against a $63.5 million legal verdict; a judge issued a recommendation Wednesday that the Miami city commissioner shouldn’t have his wages garnished to pay the Little Havana businessmen who won a lawsuit against him.
A jury ruled on June 1, 2023 that Carollo violated the rights of the businessmen, Bill Fuller and Martin Pinilla. It’s a verdict Carollo has been fighting to overturn ever since.
While trying to get the case thrown out entirely in appeals court, he’s also fought to keep his house in Coconut Grove — and portions of his paychecks — from going to Fuller and Pinilla to satisfy the judgment.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis ruled Wednesday recommending that the city of Miami cease garnishing 25% of Carollo’s wages. They had been going into escrow for the time being.
Louis had previously recommended that Carollo be able to keep his home.
Legal analyst David Weinstein said of the judge, “Her view at this point is the writ of garnishment is improper and therefore the plaintiffs are not entitled to keep taking a portion of the wages.”
In her ruling, Judge Louis states that “none of the Plaintiffs’ legal arguments are persuasive” while adding that she shares “Plaintiffs’ skepticism of the Carollos’ testimony.” In her footnote citing that “Mr. Carollo’s direct examination was heavily led by his counsel” and that his testimony “in some ways contradicted by the financial records and in other respects meaningfully uncorroborated by any records adduced at the hearing.”
“While she comments on it in the report and in the footnote that it was led by his lawyers and it is perhaps not as credible as other evidence introduced,” legal analyst David Weinstein said. “She thinks that based on the facts and law that the plaintiffs had not met their burden (preponderance of the evidence).”
Carollo hailed the decision as a victory in a news conference on Wednesday.
“I told you they would not be able to take my wages,” he said.
The plaintiffs had argued that Carollo’s wife “manipulated their financial circumstances” to make Carollo the head of family, preventing wage garnishment, something Carollo denies. He said Wednesday he provides more than 50% of their household income.
“Where’s their proof? Where’s the beef?” Carollo asked. “These people have ran a campaign of defaming me and now they have run a campaign trying to defame my wife.”
Weinstein said Wednesday’s decision “doesn’t mean this is where it ends” and said, “It is never over in the legal system until all your appeals have run out.”
“So these are victories, no question, but they may turn out to be temporary victories,” he said.“What this all means right now is that the plaintiffs are doing all they can to collect this $63.5 million dollar verdict that they have, they have been unsuccessful so far, but that doesn’t mean they will continue to be unsuccessful.”
Fuller and Pinilla’s attorney, Jeff Gutchess, said he plans to object to the report and “seek additional evidence.” Scroll to read his full statement.
Read the ruling:
Plaintiffs’ attorney statement:
Carollo attorney statement:
Copyright 2024 by WPLG Local10.com - All rights reserved.


