Skip to main content
Clear icon
63Āŗ

Denying marriage claim, justices OK James Brown's dying wish

1 / 3

AP2005

FILE - In this July 6, 2005 file photo, James Brown performs on stage during the Live 8 concert at Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh, Scotland. A prosecutor in Atlanta will decide whether to open a formal investigation after meeting with a woman who says she has evidence the legendary singer's death was caused by another person, his spokesman said. Brown, known as the Godfather of Soul, was 73 when he died of heart failure on Christmas day in 2006 in Atlanta, less than two days after being hospitalized for treatment of pneumonia. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, File)

COLUMBIA, S.C. ā€“ The Godfather of Soul's dying wish to help educate needy children is a big step closer to being fulfilled, now that South Carolina's Supreme Court ā€” wading into a 14-year-old legal saga yet again ā€” has ruled that James Brown's last partner was not legally married to him.

In an unanimous ruling on Wednesday, the state's justices wrote that Tomi Rae Hynie, a former partner of Brown's who claimed to be his wife, failed to annul a previous marriage, and therefore did not have a right to his multimillion-dollar estate.

Recommended Videos



Brown's union with Hynie has long been the center of the evolving legal troubles following his death at the age of 73 on Christmas Day 2006. The performerā€™s death touched off years of bizarre headlines, beginning with Hynie being locked out of his 60-acre estate, while photographers captured her sobbing and shaking its iron gates, begging to be let in.

Brown was renowned for hundreds of iconic musical works including hits like ā€œI Feel Goodā€ and ā€œA Manā€™s World,ā€ and was known around the world for his flashy performances and dynamic stage presence. But years of drug problems and financial mismanagement caused his estate to dwindle.

More than a dozen lawsuits have been filed over the years by people trying to lay claim to what's left, which courts have estimated to be worth anything from $5 million to more than $100 million.

Wednesdayā€™s ruling dealt another blow to a deal brokered by Gov. Henry McMaster who, as South Carolinaā€™s attorney general, stepped in to facilitate a 2009 settlement after Brownā€™s estate had been floundering in court for years. In 2013, the stateā€™s high court overturned McMaster's settlement, which would have given nearly half the estate to a charitable trust, a quarter to Hynie, and the rest to be split among his adult children.

At the time of that settlement, the exact value of Brownā€™s assets was not made public, and attorneys said his accounts had little money in them. In 2008, some of his possessions were auctioned for $850,000, in part to pay down debt, and all agreed that future income from music and movie royalties and the use of Brownā€™s highly marketable likeness was what remained at stake.

In that 2013 ruling, justices wrote McMaster hadnā€™t followed Brownā€™s expressed wishes for most of his money to go to charity, having instead selected a professional manager who took control of Brownā€™s assets from the estateā€™s trustees to settle Brown's debts. Writing that McMaster's deal ā€œdestroys the estate plan Brown had established in favor of an arrangement overseen virtually exclusively by the AG,ā€ the court also ruled then that the Godfather of Soul was of sound mind when he made his will before his death.

The justices ruled again in the case two years later, ordering all estate proceedings halted pending further evaluation by a lower court.

Finally on Wednesday, the justices ruled that Hynie has no claims on the money, and ordered a circuit court to ā€œpromptly proceed with the probate of Brownā€™s estate in accordance with his estate plan.ā€

That plan, outlined in Brown's will, was to create an ā€œI Feel Goodā€ trust that would use his music royalties to fund educational expenses for children in South Carolina and Georgia.

ā€œThe ongoing litigation since Brownā€™s passing has thwarted his expressed wish that his estate be used for educational purposes ... a point we find both extraordinary and lamentable,ā€ the court wrote.

___

Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/MegKinnardAP


Loading...

Recommended Videos